|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Aug 31, 2011 20:04:20 GMT -5
If Parvati was smart (which she is), she'd realize that she'd never get Natalie's vote to begin with so responding when Natalie said don't will lose a vote she never had but still appeal to the rest of the jury. As for Natalie's speech, yeah I agree with you. That's not All-Star worthy at all. Who'd we replace her with? LMFAO
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Kimmel on Aug 31, 2011 20:11:09 GMT -5
Okay, I'm removing Natalie from All-Stars. Anyone who thinks you shouldn't have to work to make the end is NOT an All-Star, and Natalie is praising Ashley for having a pre-game and dissing Parvati for things that make no sense.
Natalie has forgotten 1) about the Valley Girls, Parvati's attempt at an endgame alliance on DAY ONE, 2) that Parvati actually TRIED to save herself, when Ashley had a pre-game and didn't have to work, and 3) that Parvati tried and Ashley didn't need to, yet Parvati is at the end. Parvati got her way to the end by forming actual alliances that didn't intend to stick with her. Whose fault is that? People like you, Natalie.
Natalie has so many things wrong in her speech and is so beyond stupid and clueless that I've determined that she's nowhere near as good as we thought she was. She's a pawn of Ashley's trying to get her friend the win. She's not an All-Star at all.
Thanks for the worst jury speech ever, Natalie!
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Aug 31, 2011 20:14:01 GMT -5
Is anyone replacing her? XD
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Kimmel on Aug 31, 2011 22:09:17 GMT -5
Well let's see who we have!
Amber, who double self-voted Dolly, who self-voted twice and was worthless in general Julie, who got tenth place and probably did more than the others up for nomination Chase, who quit the jury like the baby he is Tom, who obviously had NO clue what really was going on in the game Chad, who went insane and had to be put down Barbie, who even admits to being a doormat since, well, I told her she couldn't make AS
...well this is a fun crop to pick from. The problem with Julie is that she was 10th place and didn't leave a huge impression. I don't see anything she did other than be a member of an alliance and just follow them until her demise.
This is easily the hardest group to pick from since there are so few deserving .Should we really limit it to four?
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Aug 31, 2011 22:31:25 GMT -5
Well you're doing 6 or 7 per season? If 6 you've just got the 4 and me/Nat. If 7.... FABIO!
|
|
|
Post by Lex van den Berghe on Sept 1, 2011 0:04:52 GMT -5
Fabio.
|
|
|
Post by DDanielle DDiLorenzo on Sept 1, 2011 8:27:19 GMT -5
Ew. No. Never Fabio. If you fuck up that badly in a challenge, you don't deserve a SECOND CHANCE. Hell, I fucked up on my Redemption Island endurance challenge, put me in second all-stars!
You see, that makes no sense. You want 6 people in all-stars?
Ashley Parvati Misty Adam Natalie B. Sandra
That's 6!
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Sept 1, 2011 8:39:13 GMT -5
I wasn't serious about Fabio btw lol
|
|
|
Post by DDanielle DDiLorenzo on Sept 1, 2011 8:44:12 GMT -5
And don't look at it in terms of us limiting them. They limited us! However, you are focusing on the negatives of these people, rather than the positives.
Natalie- Arguably the most liked player by her fellow castaways. She was strong in the early rounds, and was loyal to her alliance until the end. She even went as far as to throw away her tribal questions just to make Ashley look better. She considers the alliance still going, even if she's only on Jury.
Tom- Sure, he had no idea what was going on, but he DID find the idol. You were super proud of your clever idol hiding, and was thinking that maybe no one would find it before the final clue was revealed. Well Tom did. He may have been clueless nearly ALL of the game, but many of the girls said that the only way to take him out was while he was gone. So basically they had to take advantage of a 15 year old being forced to go on vacation.
Those are some GOOD arguments for Natalie and Tom, if you want 6 from this season.
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Kimmel on Sept 1, 2011 9:09:56 GMT -5
I see no arguments for Natalie any more. Her jury speech was the worst I have ever seen and the mindset of that you don't need to work hard to win a game is not something an All-star would agree with. She screwed her chances by not taking her jury duties seriously and I lost a great deal of respect for her. So did some of the others - she's not really that well liked anymore because she cared more about a pre-game than playing to win. She is not an All-star and that is not changing. I talked to Sandra and Kim last night and they both agree. And of course Bob Dawg is happy.
Tom would be a shoe-in if he at least figured out that he wasn't running shit, but he was so arrogant to the point that he did not even think he needed the idol and let Chad have it. His delusions are what are preventing me from letting him in. He is definitely a better pick than Natalie but he was just so beyond clueless that I am showing restraint in picking him. He got lucky and hardly realizes that.
This would be a lot easier if Chase and Chad weren't jerks. But it looks like I have to give a spot to Tom.
|
|
|
Post by Lex van den Berghe on Sept 1, 2011 9:21:12 GMT -5
Ew. No. Never Fabio. If you fuck up that badly in a challenge, you don't deserve a SECOND CHANCE. Hell, I fucked up on my Redemption Island endurance challenge, put me in second all-stars! You see, that makes no sense. lol, but you still made Ultimate Game (:
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Sept 1, 2011 9:25:56 GMT -5
oh btw; at the reveal, do Nat and I keep our old nicknames?
|
|
|
Post by Austin Gonzalez on Sept 1, 2011 10:41:37 GMT -5
I think it's possible to justify putting Tom in as he kinda has the same effect in this game as Brendan had in tocantins, albeit without the arrogancy. He also has the Coach effect where he thinks stuff is ging on but reality isn't even close.
|
|
Kim Powers
Prediction Writer
Chasing Away Your Dreams
Posts: 100
|
Post by Kim Powers on Sept 1, 2011 13:21:20 GMT -5
I think Tom should make it, poor Klein.
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Sept 1, 2011 13:45:26 GMT -5
oh btw; at the reveal, do Nat and I keep our old nicknames? ^
|
|